18 JULY 2007 NORTH Yorkshire County Council's
proposals to site a household waste recycling centre on Penny Pot
Lane has received a resounding 'no' vote at Harrogate Borough
Council's planning committee held Tuesday, 17
July. Of the fifteen members present, 14 voted
against the application with one abstention.
Under planning rules, the borough council is one of the county
council's major stakeholder consultees on the proposals but the
county council will make the eventual decision.
Mike Gardner, Leader of Harrogate Borough Council, will be
urging the county council to take on board the reasons for its
refusal and will be asking it to think again. He
said: "We desperately need a household tip in the north of
Harrogate town but this is just the wrong place to have
it. It is too far out of town with a five mile
round trip from Jennyfields the nearest neighbourhood.
"Residents are getting frustrated at the
delays. We need a site much nearer to the town
and the county council previously favoured such a site.
"The site now proposed is a greenfield site in an open
countryside location. As such, it is contrary to
planning guidance and particularly the regional spacial strategy
and the county's own Waste Local Plan.
Essentially, this facility is intended to serve the built-up area
of Harrogate and on this basis a large 'urban' development in open
countryside is not appropriate.
"It is clear that the county council is trying principally to
serve the western and northern parts of the town in order to
relieve pressure on the Stonefall facility. That
is to be commended but I am afraid to say that they must find a
better location. The national planning policy
states that developments of this nature will only be permitted if
there is a local need that cannot be met
elsewhere. The supporting information in the
planning application gives no detailed information as to why this
site is considered to be suitable in spite of there being other
locations which have not been explored in
detail. There was no discussion with our own
planners about this site, which I find rather disturbing.
"We are also surprised that they are proposing this site as it
is a clear departure from the North Yorkshire Waste Local Plan
which was adopted as recently as 2006."
Since the council prepared its report the MoD has raised
objections because of concerns that the heavy traffic flow would
impact on the operations of the Army Foundation
College. The Police Architectural Officer has
also raised objections over personal safety if the site were to be
approved and The Land Drainage Authority has objected on the
technical suitability of the site. The Borough
Council has also received fifty-six letters of objection since the
report was printed with just one in support.
The reasons for refusing the application are as follows:
- Whilst the proposal will not be highly prominent in the
landscape, it is an intrusion into the countryside
- The site is an unsuitable location for such a proposal that
will encourage car use contrary to planning guidance and
sustainability objectives
- The Local Planning Authority is not satisfied that other sites
in the urban area have not been fully explored and the development
is therefore contrary to the development plan.
Potentially, the Secretary of State could call in the
application for her own determination if the county council give
themselves permission as it is outside the Local Development
Plan.
FURTHER INFORMATION: Councillor
Mike Gardner is available for comment on 01423 500600 ext 6299 or
via Lynne Mee, Communications and Media Manager on 01423
556022. Further technical information is
available from Mr Tim Richards, Head of Planning Services on 01423
556538.